Monday, April 21, 2014

History Movies vs. Reality


Danielle Lioce

After watching Glory and A Cinderella Man in history class, we compared the dramatized Hollywood version of what happened to reality. We discussed the necessity of making it appealing to audiences to make money, and how they have ‘creative license’ that gives them the power to change things. Those two movies were made with the director trying to keep them historically accurate, to do the characters, and the history justice. In A Cinderella Man the main Character Jim Braddock is a financially struggling father in the Great depression, the scenario and movie lend itself to be a great example of how the families struggled, the men’s prides were too large, and how it was nearly impossible to get a job.

The movie A Cinderella Man focuses on how families during the great depression struggled to stay together and live comfortably. The movie illustrates the hard times of the families by showing Jim Braddock with his three small children and wife, with limited food and no electricity. The real Jim Braddock’s children were actually teenagers in real life when the story took place. The director used his ‘creative license’, to alter this piece of information, this makes the viewer feel more sympathetic for the children and Braddock. This serves to make the viewer root more for Braddock, hoping that he can win fights, and get work so he can feed his children and keep them warm during the harsh winter.

A big problem during the great depression was men’s prides were too large, and they wouldn’t except help from anybody. When the Braddocks start to really struggle and their power gets shut off, it took Jim Braddock getting his kids sent away for him to finally go get financial help. The movie puts a lot of emphasis on this event because it was a big problem in this era. When a man couldn’t provide for his family, it took away their pride, and it was a big deal for Braddock to put his pride aside and ask for money. The movie does a good job of portraying this, and in the end when Braddock pays the money back, it makes him more likeable and that does well for the movie because everybody loves the heroic good guy.

The movie also shows Braddock struggling to get steady work. He starts loosing fights and eventually looses his fighting license, so then he has to stand outside gates hoping to get picked for that day’s work. We learned about the bread lines and the lines men would wait in hoping to get picked to work.  The movie didn’t over dramatize this but they did put emphasis on it, because it illustrated how tough it was to get a job, which was historically accurate. When he eventually gets back into fighting, the movie strongly portrays him as the underdog. They made his big rival, Max Baer, a jerk and altered the portrayal of him to make Braddock look like more of an underdog that was easy to root for. From the events in the movie and how well underdog movies do in the box office, it is easy to assume the director would probably exaggerate events and details to make the public like the heroic figure.

The Great Depression was well portrayed in A Cinderella Man. The Director used his ‘creative license’ very lightly, and didn’t alter any big details to make it likeable by the public. In our U.S. History class this year we have watched and studied movies, to see how well they portray history. We have seen instances where the director changes minor details and we have seen where the director changes important historical facts. As someone who has learned the history, I think the big changes actually hinder the film. To someone that is knowledgeable, it makes the film unlikeable.